logo
HOMEFAST TRADING
BLOGDOCS
English
HOME/BLOG/92% B2B vs 20x Velocity: How USDT and USDC Divided the Stablecoin Market (5 Points)

92% B2B vs 20x Velocity: How USDT and USDC Divided the Stablecoin Market (5 Points)

liujl2026-07-09 11:27:08

On July 8, 2026, Cointelegraph reported on Dune Analytics’ latest findings: USDT and USDC are no longer competing head-to-head — they’ve divided the market. USDT has become the on-chain “Visa” for global payments, while USDC has become the “infrastructure currency” for DeFi. Together, they account for 83% of the ~$315B stablecoin market, but serve entirely different users and use cases. At the center of this divergence, TRON has emerged as the core infrastructure powering USDT’s payment dominance.

 Here are 5 key points breaking down how USDT and USDC divided the $315B stablecoin market — and why this divergence is reshaping the future of digital payments.

1. Point 1: $95B Payments & $7.9T Volume — USDT’s Payment Dominance at Scale

According to Dune’s data, USDT settled approximately $95 billion in identified commercial payments in the first half of 2026, far exceeding USDC’s ~$14B. In the B2B payment sector, USDT’s share reached 92%. This is backed by TRON’s staggering $7.9 trillion in annual USDT transfer volume throughout 2025 — equivalent to the combined GDP of Japan and Germany.

MetricUSDTUSDC
H1 2026 Commercial Payment Settlement~$95B~$14B
B2B Payment Share92%~8%
Circulating Supply~$184B–$197B~$73B–$75B
Market Share~59%~24%
Primary Use CasePayments, remittances, savingsDeFi trading, lending, liquidity

$95B in commercial payment settlements means USDT is becoming the de facto payment layer for global cross-border commerce — from supply chain settlements in Southeast Asia, to dollar-substitute savings in Latin America, to P2P remittances in Africa. TRON’s $7.9T annual volume is driven not by Wall Street traders, but by billions of ordinary people in emerging markets who are underserved by traditional banking. According to Messari, TRON captured 65% of all global retail-sized crypto transfers (under $1,000) in Q3 2025.

Key Insight: A 92% B2B payment share means that when businesses choose to settle cross-border payments with stablecoins, USDT is virtually the only option. This dominance isn’t rooted in technical superiority, but in its network effect — the more people who accept USDT, the more people need to pay with USDT, creating a self-reinforcing flywheel.

2. Point 2: 93% Wallet Holdings — Why USDT Lives in Wallets, Not Exchanges

One of the most striking data points in Dune’s report: on the TRON network, approximately 93% of USDT supply is held in regular wallets, not on centralized exchanges. This figure is far above the industry average and directly reveals USDT’s real-world utility on TRON.

In crypto markets, the percentage of a token held on exchanges typically reflects its speculative nature. USDT’s 93% wallet holding rate on TRON signals that the vast majority of holders treat it as a functional asset, used for:

  • Everyday payments & transfers: Remitting money to family overseas, paying freelance invoices, settling cross-border purchases
  • Dollar-denominated savings: In countries with severe currency devaluation (Argentina, Turkey, Nigeria), USDT serves as a “digital dollar account” for ordinary people
  • P2P trading medium: In regions lacking banking services, USDT functions as a settlement tool for offline transactions
  • Merchant acceptance: A growing number of online and offline merchants now accept USDT-TRC20 as payment

“The 93% wallet holding rate on TRON essentially means USDT has completed its transformation from an ‘exchange asset’ to ‘everyday money.’ These holders aren’t waiting for USDT to appreciate — stablecoins don’t appreciate — they’re using it to live.”

— Interpretation of Dune’s Digital Asset Brief

This data aligns with TRON’s user profile: 60% of USDT transactions on TRON fall below $1,000, confirming these are ordinary people conducting everyday financial activities, not institutional traders moving large sums.

3. Point 3: Cost Advantage — Why Small Transfers Only Work on TRON

The fundamental reason TRON became the preferred network for USDT payments can be summarized in one word: cost.

$50 USDT TransferEthereumTRON (no Energy)TRON (with Energy)
Transaction Fee~$15~$3.90~$1.20
Fee as % of Transfer30%7.8%2.4%
Settlement Speed~1–3 min~3 sec~3 sec

For a Filipino worker in Dubai remitting $200/month to Manila, a 30% fee on Ethereum is unacceptable — while TRON’s 2.4% is competitive with traditional remittance services. This cost advantage was further reinforced in August 2025, when TRON’s 27 Super Representatives approved a 60% Energy fee reduction for USDT TRC-20 transfers, causing daily active users to surge past 2.5 million within days.

For businesses processing thousands of USDT transactions daily, securing sufficient Energy traditionally requires staking large amounts of TRX. Platforms like Tronsell.io offer an alternative — on-demand TRON energy rental with no TRX staking required, fast energy allocation, API integration, and enterprise-grade scalability. This enables institutions to reduce per-transaction costs to near-zero levels while avoiding capital lockup.

4. Point 4: USDT vs USDC — The On-Chain Division of Labor

The deepest trend revealed by Dune’s report is the purpose-driven divergence in the stablecoin market — not only in use cases, but in the choice of underlying blockchain.

USDT vs USDC: Side-by-Side

  • USDT — Payments & Remittances:92% B2B share, $95B settled, 93% in regular wallets on TRON. Primary users: emerging market retail, cross-border merchants. Core networks: TRON + Ethereum.
  • USDC — DeFi Infrastructure:$2.6T on Base + $1.6T on Ethereum in June, 20x daily velocity, 56% of volume from DeFi liquidity pools. Primary users: DEX traders, market makers. Core networks: Base + Ethereum.

The Volume Paradox: In January 2026, USDC processed $8.3T in transfers while USDT processed only $1.7T — despite USDT’s supply being 2.5x larger. The reason: USDC is recycled repeatedly in DeFi (20x daily velocity), while USDT is “held” in wallets for payments. This isn’t USDT “underperforming” — it’s two assets serving fundamentally different economic functions.

BlockchainPrimary StablecoinCore PositioningTypical Users
TRONUSDT (98.6%)Payment & remittance settlementEmerging market retail users
Base (L2)USDCDeFi trading & liquidityDeFi traders, market makers
EthereumUSDT + USDCLarge settlements + DeFiInstitutions + DeFi users
SolanaUSDCHigh-frequency DeFi tradingDeFi traders

5. Point 5: Regulation & Future — The GENIUS Act and Beyond

The future of the TRON+USDT payment empire depends not only on technology and users, but on the regulatory landscape. In 2025–2026, global stablecoin regulation is undergoing a milestone transformation:

  • GENIUS Act (signed into law 2025): The first federal-level U.S. stablecoin regulatory framework, paving the way for banks and companies to issue dollar-pegged digital assets
  • CLARITY Act (under review): Establishes broader digital asset market structure, clarifying SEC vs. CFTC jurisdiction; passed the Senate Banking Committee in May, though Galaxy assessed only a 50% probability of passage before the August recess
  • Europe’s MiCA framework: Imposes reserve requirements and licensing on stablecoin issuers; Circle (USDC) has long embraced compliance, while Tether (USDT) faces ongoing scrutiny — yet the market continues to vote with its feet, choosing USDT

Core Judgment: Regulation won’t end USDT’s payment dominance, but it will reshape the competitive landscape. USDT’s advantage lies in its “de facto standard” status with hundreds of millions of global users — this network effect is far more durable than any regulatory framework. The real risk isn’t regulation itself, but the persistence of regulatory uncertainty. Meanwhile, TRON’s DPoS governance enables rapid fee adjustments — a capability that sets it apart from PoW/PoS chains.

The 5-point analysis converges on one conclusion: in the USDT vs USDC narrative, there are no losers. USDC’s DeFi dominance and USDT’s payment monopoly together form a more specialized stablecoin ecosystem. And TRON, as the core infrastructure of USDT’s payment empire, is doing something far more practical than building a “public chain narrative”: making the dollar accessible and affordable for billions of people worldwide.

FAQ

How much did USDT settle in B2B payments in 2026?

According to Dune Analytics data reported by Cointelegraph in July 2026, USDT settled approximately $95 billion in commercial payments in H1 2026, accounting for 92% of all B2B stablecoin payment volume. The TRON network processed $7.9 trillion in USDT transfers throughout 2025, averaging ~$21.6 billion per day.

What is the difference between USDT and USDC in the stablecoin market?

USDT dominates payments and remittances, settling $95B in B2B payments (92% share) in H1 2026. USDC dominates DeFi, processing $2.6T in transfers on Base in June 2026 alone, with a daily velocity of 20x its circulating supply. Together they account for ~83% of the ~$315B stablecoin market, showing a clear on-chain usage divergence.

Why is TRON the preferred network for USDT transfers?

TRON offers significantly lower transaction fees than Ethereum. A $50 USDT transfer costs approximately $1.20 on TRON (with Energy) versus $15 on Ethereum (30% of the transfer). TRON also provides ~3-second settlement and processed $7.9 trillion in USDT volume in 2025, making it the world’s largest USDT settlement network holding over 50% of global USDT supply.

How can businesses reduce USDT transfer costs on TRON?

Without Energy, each USDT transfer costs approximately $3.90; with Energy, it drops to approximately $1.20. Platforms like Tronsell.io offer on-demand TRON energy rental without requiring large TRX stakes, enabling enterprises to achieve near-zero per-transaction fees with API integration and enterprise-grade scalability.

Data Sources & References

Data Sources

  • Dune Analytics— Digital Asset Brief (July 2026)
  • Cointelegraph— Original report (July 8, 2026)
  • CryptoBriefing— Supplementary analysis
  • Messari— TRON 2025 Year-End Report (Jan 7, 2026)
  • TRON DAO— Q1 2026 reports
  • TronNRG— Energy cost analysis
  • RWA.io— TRON ecosystem metrics
  • Stablecoin Insider— Additional TRON stablecoin data
  • TRON Governance Records— August 2025
  • U.S. Congress— GENIUS Act (signed into law 2025)

Data as of July 8, 2026. All statistics are attributed to their original sources above. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.

Tags:tron energytrx energyUSDT TRC20
PreviousHas USDC Surpassed USDT? 10 Data Points That Tell the Real Story (July 2026)
NextUSDT Returns to Bitcoin via RGB: 8 Things Every TRON User Must Know (July 2026)

More Articles

The 2026 Stablecoin Shake-Up: 7 Ways It Reinforces USDT on the TRON Blockchain

2026-07-16

When Machines Pay Machines: 8 Ways the AI Agent Economy Is Reshaping TRON Transaction Demand in 2026

2026-07-15

Is USDT Becoming Real Business Money? 11 Signals from July 2026

2026-07-14